A detailed comparison of Umami and Matomo to help you choose the right tool for your needs.
Open-source web analytics platform with full data ownership.
| Plan | Umami | Matomo |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | ✓ Free (self-hosted) | ✓ Free (self-hosted) |
| Lowest Paid | $9/mo (cloud) | $23/mo (cloud) |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | Custom pricing |
| Feature | Umami | Matomo |
|---|---|---|
| Privacy-focused | ✓ | — |
| No cookies | ✓ | — |
| Self-hosting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time data | ✓ | — |
| Custom events | ✓ | — |
| Multiple sites | ✓ | — |
| API | ✓ | — |
| Teams | ✓ | — |
| Lightweight script | ✓ | — |
| Dashboard | ✓ | — |
| Web analytics | — | ✓ |
| Heatmaps | — | ✓ |
| Session recording | — | ✓ |
| Funnels | — | ✓ |
| A/B testing | — | ✓ |
| Custom reports | — | ✓ |
| SEO | — | ✓ |
| GDPR compliant | — | ✓ |
| Tag manager | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rating | ⭐ 4.3 | ⭐ 4.1 |
Choose Umami if: You need developers wanting self-hosted privacy analytics. Umami excels with its open source and self-hosted.
Choose Matomo if: You need organizations wanting full-featured self-hosted analytics. Matomo stands out with its full google analytics alternative and self-hosted option.
Best free option: Both Umami and Matomo offer free tiers. Umami offers "Free (self-hosted)" while Matomo offers "Free (self-hosted)".
It depends on your needs. Umami is better for developers wanting self-hosted privacy analytics, while Matomo is better for organizations wanting full-featured self-hosted analytics. Both are excellent tools rated 4.3 and 4.1 respectively.
Umami starts at $9/mo (cloud) while Matomo starts at $23/mo (cloud). Both offer free tiers.
Most tools offer import/export features to help you migrate. We recommend trying Matomo's free tier before fully committing to a switch.
Join our weekly ToolSwitcher digest for free alternatives, cost-cutting playbooks, and curated tool deals.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.